Narnia, Lord of the Rings, and Harry Potter

Submitted by Lucia on Sun, 12/02/2007 - 18:36

I wrote this a few months ago, when I was thirteen.

Narnia
Pros: Highly enjoyable , written marvelously. No uneeded detail, perhaps not detail enough for some. Great symbolism and anologys, all morals are to be in line. Wonderful storyline, though evil creatures are not described in deatail it is intense enough to keep you interested.

Cons: Though even adults enjoy these books, when you grow older you might want something with more pages and longer words. If so, C.S. Lewis' other fantasy series might be more worth your while. The names of the books are: [i]Out of the Silent Planet[/i] , [i]Perelandra[/i], and [i]That Hideous Strength.[/i]

Content Advisory: Very little. C.S. Lewis purposefully refrains from desribing evil creatures in detail, thus saving the sleep of many small children. But, personally, I was scared out of my wits by the werewolf and the witch in [i]Prince Caspian[/i]. Also describes wounds minimally.

Lord of the Rings

Pros: An adventure that crowns many adventures, it was written by a Catholic author, and a good writer at that. As in Narnia, great symbolism and analogies. Written for older kids, so more teens prefer it to Narnia. Rich detail and mythology make this always engrossing.

Cons: Long and detailed, too long and detailed for some.

Harry Potter:

Pros: Engrossing. So engrossing, in fact, that while reading the first five books I stopped literally only to go to Mass, eat, sleep, and use the bathroom. Has a few good morals.

Cons: Some people beleive that Harry Potter inspires the occult. My personal view on fantasy and the occult is that most authors write fantasy to make children happy and/or to make themselves rich and famous. I don't think it was J.K.'s intention to start a bunch of occult practices(though some believe it is the devil's). It is your decision to decide whether HP is occult or not. I myself never had an urge to cast a spell while reading the books. What my parents were more worrried about was that Harry frequently (in fact almost always) lies and breaks rules, and circumstances reward him for it. You have to be old enough to understand that such stuff is not "okay" before reading these books.

Content Advisory: Lots of creepy creatures and violence described well, but scary.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
These three seem to be the fantasies everybody's crazy about. So which do you think is the best?

Author's age when written
14
Genre

Comments

NARNIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Sometimes even to live is courage."
-Seneca

The books and the movies a lot of fun. But when you try to read LOTR it goes dry on you. Just my humble opinion. The Prince Caspian trailer came out today!!!!!

Scio, diligo, servo Deum.

Scio, diligo, servo Deum.

Only if you don't like all the description, and if you can't follow it. I love the description. I've read the books close to ten times.

oooooh i like Magician's Neohew2!

"Sometimes even to live is courage."
-Seneca

It was sort of like that for me the first time I read it, but then I was 11 so... Anyway, it's better now.

I have hated the words and I have loved them, and I hope I have made them right. --The Book Thief

Exactly :D
Lord of the Rings is better to me
I love it so much.
Narnia is great too though,
I just finished reading The Silver Chair again
That one is so sad though cuz Caspian dies. .

The Silver Chair is my favorite.

Of course, I've never read Harry Potter, so they could be okay, I guess. I saw the first movie and didn't really enjoy it, but then again, books are almost always, if not always, better than the movies made out of them, so I don't know...

I have hated the words and I have loved them, and I hope I have made them right. --The Book Thief

Lord of the Rings, very closely seconded by Narnia if not equal to. I've loved Narnia forever, it's sort of easier to discover when you're little, so yeah.
I've read Lord of the Rings only once (I'm finishing Return of the King again right now, but I'm not sure that counts until it's finished, plus I had to skip Fellowship of the Ring because I don't own it and I was too impatient to wait for it), but it is just the best book. No competition at all, really.

I have hated the words and I have loved them, and I hope I have made them right. --The Book Thief

Lord of the Rings, very closely seconded by Narnia if not equal to. I've loved Narnia forever, it's sort of easier to discover when you're little, so yeah.
I've read Lord of the Rings only once (I'm finished Return of the King again right now, but I'm not sure that counts until it's finished, plus I had to skip Fellowship of the Ring because I don't own it and I was too impatient to wait for it), but it is just the best book. No competition at all, really.

I have hated the words and I have loved them, and I hope I have made them right. --The Book Thief

I read Narnia when I was little, and I don't remember it very well, and I haven't read LOTR, but I loved Harry Potter.

-----------------
|Live,Laugh,Love|

GO HARRY POTTER!!!! I also love Narnia, and I have never read LOTR.

"You were not meant to fit into a shallow box built by someone else." -J. Raymond

 i have read lotr more times than just about anything else - they are soooooooooooooo amazint, the silmarillion is awesome too. oh, and what i love about LOTR is that it has so many Christian values, since it was written by a Christian. 

I've heard a lot of different things about Harry Potter, but my initial reaction is stay away from witches and all the creepy junk. 

My favorite book character EVER is Sam Gamgee he rocks!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I love Narnia too, read those a million times too. Aslan is incredible.